½Õ¬d¤é´Á Date of survey: 15/4/1999 , 6/8/1999 , 13-15/12/1999, 6,7/4/2000 , 3-5,9/10/00 , 18-30/4/2001 , 5-8/10/2001 , 2-4,8/4/2002 , 2-4,7/10/2002, 4,7-9/4/2003 , 8-11/10/2003 , 13-16/4/2004 , 11-14/10/2004, 11-14/4/2005 , 20-21/10/2005, 18-21/4/2006 , 3-6/10/2006 |
«¦W¦¸ Ranking |
©m¦W Name |
¦¸¼Æ Count |
¦ûÁ`µª®×¦Ê¤À¤ñ Percentage of Responses |
¦ûÁ`¦^µª¤H¼Æ¦Ê¤À¤ñ Percentage of Cases» |
1 | ´¿½®Åv Donald Tsang | 553 | 12.6% | 56.5% |
2 | §õ¬W»Ê Martin Lee | 294 | 6.7% | 30.0% |
3 | ð^¦~ Henry Tang | 290 | 6.6% | 29.6% |
4 | ¸³«ØµØ Tung Chee-hwa | 263 | 6.0% | 26.9% |
5 | ¥Ð¥_«T James Tien | 242 | 5.5% | 24.7% |
6 | ±ç·R¸Ö Elsie Leung | 171 | 3.9% | 17.5% |
7 | ¼B¼zë Emily Lau | 134 | 3.1% | 13.7% |
8 | §õ¥Ã¹F Lee Wing-tat | 123 | 2.8% | 12.6% |
9 | ±ç°ê¶¯ Leung Kwok-hung | 113 | 2.6% | 11.5% |
10 | S®}ÄR®õ Rita Fan | 112 | 2.6% | 11.4% |
11 | ³¯¤è¦w¥Í Anson Chan | 110 | 2.5% | 11.2% |
12 | ´¿à±¦¨ Jasper Tsang | 98 | 2.2% | 10.0% |
13 | ©P±ç²Q©É Selina Chow | 96 | 2.2% | 9.8% |
14 | §EYÁ¨ Audrey Eu | 95 | 2.2% | 9.7% |
15 | ¥q®{µØ Szeto Wah | 91 | 2.1% | 9.3% |
16 | ¾G¸g¿« Albert Cheng | 84 | 1.9% | 8.6% |
17 | °¨¤O Ma Lik | 70 | 1.6% | 7.2% |
17 | ·¨´Ë Yeung Sum | 70 | 1.6% | 7.2% |
19 | §õ°ê³¹ Arthur Li | 66 | 1.5% | 6.7% |
20 | ¹ù¨q¥V Sarah Liao | 56 | 1.3% | 5.7% |
21 | ½²¯À¥É Choy So-yuk | 51 | 1.2% | 5.2% |
22 | §õÄP¸ Allen Lee | 50 | 1.1% | 5.1% |
22 | ±ç®a³Ç Alan Leong | 50 | 1.1% | 5.1% |
24 | ÃÓÄ£©v Tam Yiu-chung | 49 | 1.1% | 5.0% |
25 | ´ö®a÷~ Tong Ka-wah | 48 | 1.1% | 4.9% |
26 | ±çÀAªQ Antony Leung | 42 | 1.0% | 4.3% |
27 | ´¿½®°ö Tsang Yam-pui | 38 | 0.9% | 3.9% |
28 | §õ¨ô¤H Lee Cheuk-yan | 37 | 0.8% | 3.8% |
29 | ³¯°û¼_ Chan Yuen-han | 34 | 0.8% | 3.5% |
30 | ©P¤@À® York Chow | 32 | 0.7% | 3.3% |
30 | ¸¼B²Q»ö Regina Ip | 32 | 0.7% | 3.3% |
32 | §õµØ©ú Fred Li | 31 | 0.7% | 3.2% |
33 | ¦ó§Ó¥ Patrick Ho | 30 | 0.7% | 3.1% |
33 | ªL·çÅï Stephen Lam | 30 | 0.7% | 3.1% |
33 | ³¯°¶·~ Albert Chan | 30 | 0.7% | 3.1% |
36 | §dÆG»ö Margaret Ng | 24 | 0.5% | 2.5% |
36 | ¼B¤d¥Û Lau Chin-shek | 24 | 0.5% | 2.5% |
36 | ¾G®a´I Andrew Cheng | 24 | 0.5% | 2.5% |
39 | Ò\ÂÔ¥Ó James To | 21 | 0.5% | 2.1% |
40 | ®]©ú´ Michael Suen | 20 | 0.5% | 2.0% |
40 | ±ç®¶^ Leung Chun-ying | 20 | 0.5% | 2.0% |
42 | ¦ó«T¤¯ Albert Ho | 18 | 0.4% | 1.8% |
43 | §õ°êÄ_ David Li | 16 | 0.4% | 1.6% |
43 | ¼B¦¿µØ Lau Kong-wah | 16 | 0.4% | 1.6% |
45 | ¶À§»µo Andrew Wong | 15 | 0.3% | 1.5% |
46 | ¤ý¥Ã¥ Joseph Wong | 14 | 0.3% | 1.4% |
47 | ´¿«TµØ John Tsang | 13 | 0.3% | 1.3% |
47 | ¶¾À˰ò Frederick Fung | 13 | 0.3% | 1.3% |
47 | ÃÓ´f¯] Maria Tam | 13 | 0.3% | 1.3% |
50 | ±çÄ£©¾ Leung Yiu-chung | 12 | 0.3% | 1.2% |
51 | ùS´Ôªâ Fanny Law | 10 | 0.2% | 1.0% |
52 | ³¯Å²ªL Chan Kam-lam | 10 | 0.2% | 1.0% |
53 | ±i¤å¥ú Cheung Man-kwong | 9 | 0.2% | 0.9% |
54 | §õ¤Ö¥ú Ambrose Lee | 8 | 0.2% | 0.8% |
55 | ¦ó¨qÄõ Ho Sau-lan | 8 | 0.2% | 0.8% |
56 | ´¿¾Ë±ê Tsang Hin-chi | 7 | 0.2% | 0.7% |
57 | ¥ô§Óè Joseph Yam | 7 | 0.2% | 0.7% |
58 | °¨®É¦ë Frederick Ma | 7 | 0.2% | 0.7% |
59 | ¸°êÁ¾ Ip Kwok-him | 7 | 0.2% | 0.7% |
60 | ¾GÄ£´Å Cheng Yiu-tong | 7 | 0.2% | 0.7% |
61 | §d¥ú¥¿ Peter Woo | 6 | 0.1% | 0.6% |
62 | §õ¹Å¸Û Li Ka-shing | 6 | 0.1% | 0.6% |
63 | ³æ¥ò°º Sin Chung-kai | 6 | 0.1% | 0.6% |
64 | ´¿°·¦¨ Bull Tsang | 6 | 0.1% | 0.6% |
65 | ¸æ@ûi(©[) Stephen Ip | 6 | 0.1% | 0.6% |
66 | ¸â°ö©¾ Chim Pui-chung | 6 | 0.1% | 0.6% |
67 | §õ°êÅï Joseph Lee | 5 | 0.1% | 0.5% |
68 | ᬴̱j Yeoh Eng-kiong | 5 | 0.1% | 0.5% |
¨ä¥L Other* | 65 | 1.5% | 6.6% | |
øª¾/ÃøÁ¿ DK/HS | 204 | 4.7% | 20.8% |
Á`µª®× Total responses | 4373 |
Á`¦^µª¤H¼Æ Total cases | 979 |
¡@
* ´£¦W¤p©ó¤¦¸ (Less than five namings)
ªí®æ²Ä¤@Äæ©Ò¸üªº³¡¤À¼Æ¾Ú³s½u¤´¦b«Ø³]©Î¼W¸É¶¥¬q¡C¥Á¬ãp¹ºªº¥Ø¼Ð¬OºÉ§Ö³]¥ß¤@¯¸¦¡ªº¼Æ¾Ú¸ê®Æ®w¡A¤è«KŪªÌ¬d¾\©Ò¦³¬Fªv¤Hª«ªº©Ò¦³µû¤À¡C¤£¹L¡A¥Ñ©ó¼Æ¾ÚÁc¦h¡A©Ò¥H³]p»Ý®É¡AÀµ½Ð¨£½Ì¡C Some data links accessible via entries in the first column are yet to be constructed or enhanced. We aim at providing a one-stop service for displaying all popularity ratings for all political figures in due course, but this will take some time. |